The California Court of Court of Appeal affirmed the family court’s division of marital property and rejected father’s four claims of error.
Father makes four appellate complaints about the family court’s division of marital property. First, from the value of the home awarded to Mother, the court subtracted $171,099, which was the balance outstanding on a home equity credit line.
Father objects, saying his two witnesses testified the lender wrote off the loan, leaving a balance of zero, not $171,099.
Second, the court sanctioned Father for failing to make proper disclosures about a different house. Father claims error because the court made no finding Mother was unaware of this other house.
Third, Father argues the court misinterpreted a 2008 court order to sell a third property. The error, Father argues, was to read the order as requiring him to act swiftly.
Fourth, Father complains about treatment of a Jeep, tools, an all-terrain vehicle, and his watch. We affirm
The court deferred to the family court’s credibility call in rejecting two of father’s witnesses as unreliable, and held that substantial evidence supported the family court’s conclusion that a $171,099 obligation remained on the Hacienda Heights home, which sum it subtracted from the home’s value. The court upheld the family court’s sanction against father for his omission of another property in his preliminary and final declarations of disclosure.
The court held that the family court did not abuse its discretion in interpreting a 2008 order directing father to sell a third property. Finally, the court held that substantial evidence supported the family court’s judgment regarding father’s Jeep, tools, all-terrain vehicle, and watch.
If you are involved in an acrimonious type divorce and involving property rights, a custody or support battle, or family law matter, you need an experienced and capable attorney on your side. Contact the Law Office of Robert Rodriguez! Call (209) 596-4264 or 510-736-4033 immediately!
Robert Rodriguez has litigated well over 100 family law cases and civil litigation matters including personal injury motor vehicle cases, dog bite and slip & fall cases, breach of contract, defamation & invasion of privacy, fraud, unfair business practice, malicious prosecution, wrongful termination, workplace and employment matters including sexual harassment, wage & hour violations, discrimination pursuant to the FEHA, Gov’t Code §§ 12940 et seq., violations of the FMLA & Pregnancy Leave, Civil Rights discrimination pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in the State of California and California federal district courts. No guarentees represented.